×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

0.11ct Ruby (Round, 2.86×2.86mm, Red) vs 0.05ct Ruby (Round, 2.2×2.2mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.11ct Ruby (2.86×2.86mm, round cut) appears 69% larger than 0.05ct Ruby (2.2×2.2mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

0.11ct Ruby (round cut)
vs
0.05ct Ruby (round cut)
red
 
red
2.86×2.86 mm 2.2×2.2 mm
actual size
Actual size of 0.11ct Ruby (round cut, 2.86×2.86mm, Red color)   Actual size of 0.05ct Ruby (round cut, 2.2×2.2mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 0.11ct Ruby (round cut, 2.86×2.86mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 0.05ct Ruby (round cut, 2.2×2.2mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
17% vs 14%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 0.11ct Ruby Round (2.86×2.86mm, Red) and 0.05ct Ruby Round (2.2×2.2mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


0.11 Ct Ruby (Round) 0.05 Ct Ruby (Round)
2.86×2.86 mm vs 2.2×2.2 mm
6.42 mm²   3.8 mm²
Face-up size outline for 0.11ct Ruby (2.86×2.86mm, round cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.05ct Ruby (2.2×2.2mm, round cut)
0.11ct Ruby Round (2.86×2.86mm)
0.05ct Ruby Round (2.2×2.2mm)
Difference: 69% (2.62 mm²)
0.11ct Ruby (Round, 2.86×2.86mm) has approx. 69% more face-up area than 0.05ct Ruby (Round, 2.2×2.2mm).


Popular comparisons: