×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

0.1ct Emerald (Round, 3.16×3.16mm, Green) vs 2.9ct Sapphire (Cushion, 7.5×8.5mm, Blue)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 2.9ct Sapphire (7.5×8.5mm, cushion cut) appears 7.3 times larger than 0.1ct Emerald (3.16×3.16mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

0.1ct Emerald (round cut)
vs
2.9ct Sapphire (cushion cut)
green
 
blue
3.16×3.16 mm 7.5×8.5 mm
actual size
Actual size of 0.1ct Emerald (round cut, 3.16×3.16mm, Green color)   Actual size of 2.9ct Sapphire (cushion cut, 7.5×8.5mm, Blue color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Green 0.1ct Emerald (round cut, 3.16×3.16mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Blue 2.9ct Sapphire (cushion cut, 7.5×8.5mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
19% vs 51%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 0.1ct Emerald Round (3.16×3.16mm, Green) and 2.9ct Sapphire Cushion (7.5×8.5mm, Blue) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Sapphire will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (4 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


0.1 Ct Emerald (Round) 2.9 Ct Sapphire (Cushion)
3.16×3.16 mm vs 7.5×8.5 mm
7.84 mm²   57.38 mm²
Face-up size outline for 2.9ct Sapphire (7.5×8.5mm, cushion cut)
Face-up size outline for 0.1ct Emerald (3.16×3.16mm, round cut)
0.1ct Emerald Round (3.16×3.16mm)
2.9ct Sapphire Cushion (7.5×8.5mm)
Difference: 632% (49.54 mm²)
2.9ct Sapphire (Cushion, 7.5×8.5mm) has approx. 632% more face-up area than 0.1ct Emerald (Round, 3.16×3.16mm). In other words, it's 7.32x larger.


Popular comparisons: