0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, 6.1×4.3mm, Green) vs 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, 5.74×4.07mm, Yellow)
Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (5.74×4.07mm, emerald cut) appears 34% larger than 0.32ct Emerald (6.1×4.3mm, trillion cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.
| 0.32ct Emerald (trillion cut) |
vs
|
0.68ct Chrysoberyl (emerald cut) |
|
green |
|
|
| 6.1×4.3 mm | 5.74×4.07 mm | |
| actual size | ||
|
|
|
|
|
||
Actual size is set for screen
|
Ring:
Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
|
|
64 mm |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Actual sizes of
0.32ct Emerald Trillion (6.1×4.3mm, Green)
and
0.68ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (5.74×4.07mm, Yellow)
as they would appear on a ring and finger.
Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.
Where to buy?
For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile
Face-up Size
All things being equal, Chrysoberyl will face-up smaller than Emerald for a given
carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity
(3.73 vs. 2.72 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Emerald of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.
| 0.32 Ct Emerald (Trillion) | 0.68 Ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald) | |
| 6.1×4.3 mm | vs | 5.74×4.07 mm |
| 16.26 mm² | 21.73 mm² |
| 0.32ct Emerald Trillion (6.1×4.3mm) | |
| 0.68ct Chrysoberyl Emerald (5.74×4.07mm) | |
| Difference: 34% (5.47 mm²) |
0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, 5.74×4.07mm) has approx. 34% more face-up area than 0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, 6.1×4.3mm).
Popular comparisons:
- 0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.1 x 4.3) vs. 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, Light Green , 5.74 x 4.07)
- 0.32ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.1 x 4.3) vs. 0.68ct Chrysoberyl (Emerald, Light Yellowish Green, 5.76 x 4.27)
- 1.7ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 9.56 x 9.56) vs. 0.9ct Sapphire (Round, Blue, 5.77 x 5.77)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 0.4ct Emerald (Oval, Green, 6.36 x 4.24)
- 1ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 8.01 x 8.01) vs. 1ct Emerald (Emerald, Green, 7.28 x 5.39)
- 5ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 13.7 x 13.7) vs. 5ct Sapphire (Trillion, Blue, 12.02 x 12.02)
- 34ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 25.96 x 25.96) vs. 20ct Diamond (Round, White, 17.64 x 17.64)
- 0.65ct Emerald (Trillion, Green, 6.94 x 6.94) vs. 1.15ct Diamond (Emerald, White, 7.01 x 5.19)