×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

1.8ct Diamond (Oval, 10×7mm, White) vs 1.8ct Diamond (Oval, 9×6.6mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 1.8ct Diamond (10×7mm, oval cut) appears 18% larger than 1.8ct Diamond (9×6.6mm, oval cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

1.8ct Diamond (oval cut)
vs
 1.8ct Diamond (oval cut)
white
 
white
10×7 mm 9×6.6 mm
actual size
Actual size of 1.8ct Diamond (oval cut, 10×7mm, White color)   Actual size of 1.8ct Diamond (oval cut, 9×6.6mm, White color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 1.8ct Diamond (oval cut, 10×7mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 1.8ct Diamond (oval cut, 9×6.6mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 42% vs 40%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1.8ct Diamond Oval (10×7mm, White) and 1.8ct Diamond Oval (9×6.6mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1.8 Ct Diamond (Oval) 1.8 Ct Diamond (Oval)
10×7 mm vs 9×6.6 mm
57.4 mm²   48.71 mm²
Face-up size outline for 1.8ct Diamond (10×7mm, oval cut)
Face-up size outline for 1.8ct Diamond (9×6.6mm, oval cut)
1.8ct Diamond Oval (10×7mm)
1.8ct Diamond Oval (9×6.6mm)
Difference: 18% (8.69 mm²)
1.8ct Diamond (Oval, 10×7mm) has approx. 18% more face-up area than 1.8ct Diamond (Oval, 9×6.6mm).


Popular comparisons: