×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

1.9ct Ruby (Round, 7.4×7.4mm, Red) vs 4.7ct Ruby (Oval, 12.84×8.56mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 4.7ct Ruby (12.84×8.56mm, oval cut) appears 2.1 times larger than 1.9ct Ruby (7.4×7.4mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

1.9ct Ruby (round cut)
vs
 4.7ct Ruby (oval cut)
red
 
red
7.4×7.4 mm 12.84×8.56 mm
actual size
Actual size of 1.9ct Ruby (round cut, 7.4×7.4mm, Red color)   Actual size of 4.7ct Ruby (oval cut, 12.84×8.56mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 1.9ct Ruby (round cut, 7.4×7.4mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 4.7ct Ruby (oval cut, 12.84×8.56mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
 Gold
Skin tone
 Light
Ring diameter
 16.9 mm
Ring width
 3.0 mm
Finger length
 64 mm
Finger coverage
 44% vs 51%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 1.9ct Ruby Round (7.4×7.4mm, Red) and 4.7ct Ruby Oval (12.84×8.56mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


1.9 Ct Ruby (Round) 4.7 Ct Ruby (Oval)
7.4×7.4 mm vs 12.84×8.56 mm
43.01 mm²   90.13 mm²
Face-up size outline for 4.7ct Ruby (12.84×8.56mm, oval cut)
Face-up size outline for 1.9ct Ruby (7.4×7.4mm, round cut)
1.9ct Ruby Round (7.4×7.4mm)
4.7ct Ruby Oval (12.84×8.56mm)
Difference: 110% (47.12 mm²)
4.7ct Ruby (Oval, 12.84×8.56mm) has approx. 110% more face-up area than 1.9ct Ruby (Round, 7.4×7.4mm). In other words, it's 2.1x larger.


Popular comparisons: