×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

3.3ct Emerald (Pear, 13×9.5mm, Green) vs 2.4ct Emerald (Oval, 11×9mm, Green)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3.3ct Emerald (13×9.5mm, pear cut) appears 11% larger than 2.4ct Emerald (11×9mm, oval cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

3.3ct Emerald (pear cut)
vs
2.4ct Emerald (oval cut)
green
 
green
13×9.5 mm 11×9 mm
actual size
Actual size of 3.3ct Emerald (pear cut, 13×9.5mm, Green color)   Actual size of 2.4ct Emerald (oval cut, 11×9mm, Green color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Green 3.3ct Emerald (pear cut, 13×9.5mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Green 2.4ct Emerald (oval cut, 11×9mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
57% vs 54%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 3.3ct Emerald Pear (13×9.5mm, Green) and 2.4ct Emerald Oval (11×9mm, Green) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


3.3 Ct Emerald (Pear) 2.4 Ct Emerald (Oval)
13×9.5 mm vs 11×9 mm
90.16 mm²   81.18 mm²
Face-up size outline for 3.3ct Emerald (13×9.5mm, pear cut)
Face-up size outline for 2.4ct Emerald (11×9mm, oval cut)
3.3ct Emerald Pear (13×9.5mm)
2.4ct Emerald Oval (11×9mm)
Difference: 11% (8.98 mm²)
3.3ct Emerald (Pear, 13×9.5mm) has approx. 11% more face-up area than 2.4ct Emerald (Oval, 11×9mm).


Popular comparisons: