×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

3ct Ruby (Emerald, 9.21×6.82mm, Red) vs 2ct Ruby (Round, 7.53×7.53mm, Red)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 3ct Ruby (9.21×6.82mm, emerald cut) appears 31% larger than 2ct Ruby (7.53×7.53mm, round cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger. 

3ct Ruby (emerald cut)
vs
2ct Ruby (round cut)
red
 
red
9.21×6.82 mm 7.53×7.53 mm
actual size
Actual size of 3ct Ruby (emerald cut, 9.21×6.82mm, Red color)   Actual size of 2ct Ruby (round cut, 7.53×7.53mm, Red color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 3ct Ruby (emerald cut, 9.21×6.82mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Red 2ct Ruby (round cut, 7.53×7.53mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
41% vs 45%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 3ct Ruby Emerald (9.21×6.82mm, Red) and 2ct Ruby Round (7.53×7.53mm, Red) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

The face-up size depends on the shape of the gem, its weight and the proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


3 Ct Ruby (Emerald) 2 Ct Ruby (Round)
9.21×6.82 mm vs 7.53×7.53 mm
58.42 mm²   44.53 mm²
Face-up size outline for 3ct Ruby (9.21×6.82mm, emerald cut)
Face-up size outline for 2ct Ruby (7.53×7.53mm, round cut)
3ct Ruby Emerald (9.21×6.82mm)
2ct Ruby Round (7.53×7.53mm)
Difference: 31% (13.89 mm²)
3ct Ruby (Emerald, 9.21×6.82mm) has approx. 31% more face-up area than 2ct Ruby (Round, 7.53×7.53mm).


Popular comparisons: