×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

3ct Ruby (Oval, 10.91×7.27mm, Red) vs 4ct Sapphire (Oval, 12×8mm, Blue)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 4ct Sapphire (12×8mm, oval cut) appears 21% larger than 3ct Ruby (10.91×7.27mm, oval cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

3ct Ruby (oval cut)
vs
4ct Sapphire (oval cut)
red
 
blue
10.91×7.27 mm 12×8 mm
actual size
Actual size of 3ct Ruby (oval cut, 10.91×7.27mm, Red color)   Actual size of 4ct Sapphire (oval cut, 12×8mm, Blue color)
 
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
Red 3ct Ruby (oval cut, 10.91×7.27mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
Blue 4ct Sapphire (oval cut, 12×8mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
44% vs 48%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 3ct Ruby Oval (10.91×7.27mm, Red) and 4ct Sapphire Oval (12×8mm, Blue) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

Ruby and Sapphire have the same specific gravity so their face-up size depends on the weight, shape and proportions of the cut. Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


3 Ct Ruby (Oval) 4 Ct Sapphire (Oval)
10.91×7.27 mm vs 12×8 mm
65.04 mm²   78.72 mm²
Face-up size outline for 4ct Sapphire (12×8mm, oval cut)
Face-up size outline for 3ct Ruby (10.91×7.27mm, oval cut)
3ct Ruby Oval (10.91×7.27mm)
4ct Sapphire Oval (12×8mm)
Difference: 21% (13.68 mm²)
4ct Sapphire (Oval, 12×8mm) has approx. 21% more face-up area than 3ct Ruby (Oval, 10.91×7.27mm).


Popular comparisons: