×
carat vs. color  length*  width*
  ×

(or examine a )
* size in mm (optional)

9ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald, 11.84×8.77mm, White) vs 9ct Moissanite (Emerald, 14.28×10.58mm, White)


Quick summary: When looked from above (face-up position), 9ct Moissanite (14.28×10.58mm, emerald cut) appears 46% larger than 9ct Cubic Zirconia (11.84×8.77mm, emerald cut). See below how they compare side-by-side on a ring and finger.

9ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut)
vs
9ct Moissanite (emerald cut)
white
 
white
11.84×8.77 mm 14.28×10.58 mm
actual size
Actual size of 9ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut, 11.84×8.77mm, White color)   Actual size of 9ct Moissanite (emerald cut, 14.28×10.58mm, White color)
Actual size is set for screen
Ring: Skin tone:
Ring width: 3.0 mm
Left finger image
Ring on left finger
White 9ct Cubic Zirconia (emerald cut, 11.84×8.77mm) on a left ring and finger
64 mm
Right finger image
Ring on a right finger
White 9ct Moissanite (emerald cut, 14.28×10.58mm) on a right ring and finger
Your settings
Ring
Gold
Skin tone
Light
Ring diameter
16.9 mm
Ring width
3.0 mm
Finger length
64 mm
Finger coverage
52% vs 63%
Saved...
Ring diameter: 16.9 mm
USA UK Asia EU1 EU2
Actual sizes of 9ct Cubic Zirconia Emerald (11.84×8.77mm, White) and 9ct Moissanite Emerald (14.28×10.58mm, White) as they would appear on a ring and finger. Adjust the ring and finger size to get an idea of how these gemstones would look on your finger.

Where to buy?

For certified gemstones, high-end gemstone jewelry, and birthstone jewelry, see Blue Nile

Face-up Size

All things being equal, Cubic Zirconia will face-up smaller than Moissanite for a given carat weight, because it has higher specific gravity (5.65 vs. 3.22 - this means it's "heavier" compared to Moissanite of the same size). Face-up size also depends heavily on the proportions of the cut.

Face-up area is a measure of the size of the gem when viewed from above (as set in a ring). It tells you how big the gem is at the girdle plane.


9 Ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald) 9 Ct Moissanite (Emerald)
11.84×8.77 mm vs 14.28×10.58 mm
96.57 mm²   140.51 mm²
Face-up size outline for 9ct Moissanite (14.28×10.58mm, emerald cut)
Face-up size outline for 9ct Cubic Zirconia (11.84×8.77mm, emerald cut)
9ct Cubic Zirconia Emerald (11.84×8.77mm)
9ct Moissanite Emerald (14.28×10.58mm)
Difference: 46% (43.94 mm²)
9ct Moissanite (Emerald, 14.28×10.58mm) has approx. 46% more face-up area than 9ct Cubic Zirconia (Emerald, 11.84×8.77mm).


Popular comparisons: